The Paradoxes of Modern Existence
As we once again honour the holiday season in the West one cannot help but ponder the paradoxes of modern existence. For many (if not most) in the West, there is a total denial of the Christian belief system as a way of life. We may claim a return, rather, to the worship of the promise of sun return and perhaps there is some sense in this. Of all the forces that shape human existence, none is more vital to us than the warmth and energy which comes to us from this inconsequential star. However, for we in the South there is no need to worship Sun return. The Sun is high in the sky, the air is warm and we worship instead at the altar of sport, beachside activities and the laden table.
But in the midst of all this, there is one form of worship which for many has become all consuming. Once again, here in Australia, the shops have opened and Australians have yielded to the temptation to spend way beyond their means. Indications are that as a nation we have spent somewhere around $5 billion dollars in a single day. Yet we can ill afford such expenditure. Not only is this profligate purchasing of things, many of which are probably unnecessary, and a consequent expansion for many of their total debt situation. It also represents the generation of vast volumes of additional waste in the form of packaging, not to mention the waste associated with the production of goods of questionable value. For many, one cannot help but wonder how long the joy of the new possession will last once the packaging has been removed and yet another item is added to the cupboard to be subsequently forgotten. And how much will end up in of the self storage parks that dot every large community.
On Being Human
So much of what we do in EcoThought revolves around understanding how to design environments to create sustainable human living environments, that I could not help but take some time out to consider what it actually means to be human.
Setting aside belief systems as a basis for defining what it means to be human, one rapidly comes to the bedrock that Descartes encountered when he coined the well known phrase "cogito ergo sum" - (I am thinking, therefore I exist). From this bedrock Descartes rebuilt his philosophy on the basis of his belief in a "perfect, all-powerful, all-knowing God". In a global society, however, where for many a belief in such a God is not a part of their existence, how do we move from this bedrock to understand what it means to be human.
Modern Business and the Online World
As a result of recent business experience, I have started to ponder whether people think email is a formal method of communication or not. All modern businesses rely on email as the basis for communicating with other companies, organisations and individuals. Traditional mail has significantly decreased in its usage, and in fact has been tagged as "snail mail" which conveys a sense that it is not capable of responding to the needs of the modern business or person.
If, however, it is so critical to modern business, then perhaps we need to be clear about what is "appropriate" behaviour in the use of email. For example, should emails be subject to a moral obligation of response (excluding spam of course)? I have encountered a number of individuals with whom I have worked over the last three years for whom ignoring an email is the standard response, particularly if replying will require some level of thinking or some action on their part. Maybe this is appropriate behaviour. If the same individual received a hard copy "snail mail" letter, would they feel more obligated to respond? Or perhaps it is just a sign of our times that ignorant behaviour is normal.
Beige Thinking
Homo sapein sapein has made amazing leaps in the last 6000 years. The rate of innovation in modern times is nothing less than astonishing. In the internet age a full technology cycle is now somewhere around 3 years. So much of this advance happened in western countries but somewhere in the last 10 years a fascinating new influence has infiltrated its way into western nations, including Australia. This influence has acted to suppress innovation, to deride original thought and to suggest instead that watching other people living in a house or fighting to rise to supremacy on a desert island is actually more enjoyable than learning, listening to music, reading a good book or spending time with good friends.

